The assets declared by judges: houses and cars at negligible costs
Most judges undervalue their movable and immovable property which they officially declare to own. The reporters of the Center for Investigative Journalismarrived to this conclusion after having examined more than 400 declarations of income and assets, submitted by magistrates for 2014.
The legislation requires that in declaration of assets is indicated the cadastral estimate of the property, which in almost all cases is far below market value. For cars, the price is quoted from the contract of sale, which is also, in many cases, lower than the real one. Experts say it is a vicious practice and blame it on the lack of morality and integrity of judges who use legal loopholes to conceal the real value of their assets.
Lilia Lupasco with a 500 euro Mercedes
Lilia Lupasco from Riscani Court, Chisinau, who has had the mandate of a judge since 2008, owns two cars. One is a Chevrolet Captiva (year of make 2011), worth 456,250 lei, bought in leasing in 2013. A second car, a Mercedes-Benz E220, manufactured in 2008, appears in the declaration of assets as purchased in 2012 with only 10,000 lei. On the car market such a vehicle can now be found at a price of 10,000 euros, and in 2012 it would have cost even more. Her colleague from the same court, Aliona Miron, indicated in the declaration of assets that she owns a similar car, only produced in 2004, for which she paid 8,000 euros.
Court magistrate, Diana Cristina from Straseni, indicated in the declaration of assets that she owns a Nissan Almira Tino (manufactured in 2006), which she purchased in 2012 with only 5,000 lei. On a Moldovan car sales site we’ve found a car of this model produced in 2005 at a price of 4,700 euros.
Judge Ludmila Holevitcaia has been working in the system since 2008, and last year was transferred from the Comrat Court to Riscani Court in Chisinau. The magistrate declared to have bought in 2013 a Mazda 6 (produced in 2003), for which she would have paid only 10,000 lei. In 2009 she bought a BMW 525 d (2001), for which she would have paid even less - 3,000 lei. Currently, a Mazda 6, produced in 2003, in the best case,can be purchased on the car market in Moldova for 3,500 euros and a BMW 525 d 2001 costs at least 5,000 euros.
Ludmila Gradinaru, working since 2011 in Floresti Court, owns a Honda Jazz (year of manufacture 2006). In the declaration of assets and income she said she had bought the car in 2014 with 10,000 lei. The market price for a 9-year old car of this model is about 4,000 euros.
Magistrates with cars worth 10 000 lei
Ghenadie Matu, a judge from Soroca since 2003, declared in his income and assets statement a Hyundai Tucson bought in 2012 (year of make 2008) with only 10, 000 lei. A similar car, only older one, from 2005, is being sold for 9500 euros on a Moldovan website.
Aureliu Postica from Riscani court, Chisinau also claims to have paid only 10,000 lei for a Toyota Yaris (year of make 2004), registered under his wife’s name. The market cost of such vehicle varies between 3,000 and 4,500 euros.
Alexander Spoiala from Ciocana Court, Chisinau declared that he had paid only 500 euros in 2010 for his Renault Megane (manufactured in 2006). Currentl, sucha car costs at least 3,000 euros more than the magistrate had allegedly paid five years ago.
Zinaida Talpalaru, Chairman of the Commercial Court ofChisinau, also indicated in the declaration of assets prices that by farare not corresponding to reality. She claims that her Citroën C3 (manufactured in 2002), bought in 2009 would have cost her 12,824 lei, and her Mercedes Benz S320 (from 2002) would have cost 15,115 lei in 2006. I found asimilar Mercedeson the car market, only four years older and in poor condition, which is being sold for 3,500 euros. While the market price for a Citroën C3 of 2002 is no less than 2,000 euros.
The practice of undervaluation of owned movables is also common for Supreme Court magistrates. Thus, the judge, Sveatoslav Moldovan, who has been working in the high court since 2003, like many of his colleagues in the lower courts, writes in his income and assets statement that his Toyota Avensis, purchased in 2008, cost him 10,000 lei. On the Moldovanmarket such a car is estimated to be at least 7,500 euro.
According to the income and assets statement, Vladimir Timofti, magistrate of the Supreme Court of Justice, has three cars. In the case of two of them seems to be the case of undervaluation. Timofti claims that he purchased in 2012 a Rover 25 (year of make- 2001) with 5,000 lei, and a Hyundai Santa Fe (manufactured in 2007) last year for 28,000 lei. A Rover 25 2001 is sold on the domestic car market for some 2,500 euros and the second car costs at least 10,000 euros.
The fact that magistrates undervalue their cars in the statements of income and assets is also confirmed by the estimates made at our request by an auto expert, Andrei Tabuica,
Andrei Tabuica, chief editor at AutoExpert.md: “Car prices vary greatly depending on equipment, mileage, condition and type of engine. Some models were not officially available on the market, being imported by individuals from other countries.Fora Mercedes-Benz E220, manufactured in 2008, the average price variesbetween 9.500-11.500 euro; a Nissan Almira Tino, manufactured in 2006: 5.000-6.000 euro; Mazda 6, manufactured in 2003: 3.500-5.500 euro (depending on the generation), BMW 525 d, manufacturedin 2001: 5.000-7.000 euro; Honda Jazz, manufacturedin 2006: 4.000-4.700 euro; Hyundai Tucson from 2008: 6.000-7.000 euro; Toyota Yaris from 2004: 3.500-4.000 euro; Renault Megane, manufactured in 2006: 3.000-4.000 euro; Citroën C3, manufactured in 2002: 2.500-3.500 euro; Mercedes Benz S320, year of make 2002: 8.000-10.000 euro; Toyota Avensis, manufactured in 2008: 7.500-8.500 euro; Rover 25, year of make- 2001: 2.000-2.500 euro; Hyundai Santa Fe, manufactured in2007: 10.000-12.000 euro.”
Places to live up to 2 thousand euro
In the case of real estate magistrates are also not embarrassed to reduce prices in the statements of income and assets. The law requires indicating the cadastral value, which however, often does not correspond to the market value. Using this, and other legislative gaps, some judges declare imaginary prices. For example, Iurie Sceastlivii, who has been workingat Ialoveni Court since 1993, states that the apartment registered to his wife, with an area of 60.8 square meters, costs no more than 16.645 lei.
Aliona Donos from Balti Court declares in her income and assets statement a house with an area of 79.8 square meters worth 39,625 lei, acquired by inheritance in 2014.
A relevant case is that of Aliona Miron from Riscani Court of the Capital, who owns several real estate objects. Among other things, she declares a house with an area of 141.7 square meters, with related land and annexes, worth 46,875 lei, received as donation in 2011, and another house of 131 square meters, with annexes and land of 0.2587 ha, amounting to only 14 069 lei, received as inheritance in 2010.
No home, no car
If one is to believe the information in the income and assets statements of magistrates, at least 25% of them would be poor and would not own - neither them nor their families - any home or car. For instance, the investigating judge Constantin Damaschin from Botanica Court in Chisinau, although claiming that he had obtained a plot of land for construction back on 31st December 2005 (just three months after receiving his judge mandate), officially, he doesn’t have a home. The press wrote about Svetlana Filincova, judge from the Supreme Court, and Sergiu Arnaut, judge at the Court of Appeal, living in luxury homes that are not indicated however, in their income and assets statements.
Judging by his income and assets statement,Vladimir Braşoveanu,also appears to be poor.Tthe magistrate who has worked many years at the Center Court of Chisinau and on 7 August 2015, by a presidential decree, was appointed judge at the Chisinau Court of Appeal. In fact, Vladimir Braşoveanu lives in a luxury villa on the Ialoveni street fromChisinau.
Also, according to the statement of assets, Ion Plesca, chairman of the Court of Appeal, does not own any means of transport - neither he nor his wife, however owninga multi-million real estate.
Magistrate: „I never thought I could have any problems”
Contacted by phone, several judges concerned in the investigation avoided or refused to comment. The magistrate, Vladimir Timofti, told us that the car had been purchased by his wife and we should ask her why it cost so. Zinaida Talpalaru explained that the two cars had been purchased abroad by her husband and indicated in the declaration of assets the prices contained in the contracts of sale. "The law provides to indicate the price from official documents. I never thought that I could have any problems ", stressed the chairman of the Commercial Court.
National Integrity Commission does not check car prices
National Integrity Commission verified this year the declarations of assets of 17 judges. Only in three cases were found violations on the accuracy of the statements and Prosecutor General Office was notified. The violations regardedMihai Ciuntu, magistrate at Criuleni Court, Svetlana Filincova, judge at the Supreme Court and Sergiu Arnaut,judge at the Chisinau Court of Appeal. In the last two cases, NIC took action after the publication of investigation materials in the press. In the other 14 cases, the NIC suspended the inspectionon the grounds that the deviations "were not committed intentionally." Andrian Popenco, the Anticorruption Prosecutor's interim head, told us that all three cases were dismissed on the grounds of not meeting the elements of an offence.
Cristina Dumbravan, press officer at NIC, told us that the institution she represents is not checking car prices in the declarations of income and assets. "File a notification and NIC will check it" suggested Dumbravan.
Member of the Superior Council of Magistrates: “an offence under the Criminal Code”
Teodor Carnat, member of the Superior Council of Magistrates, believes that judges undervalue the prices for their real estate and vehicles in order to evade taxes. Another reason is that the value of goods on the declaration of assets has to match revenues. "This is forgery of public documents, an offense under the Criminal Code", said SCM member. The problem is that such offences are almost impossible to prove because the magistrates conclude contracts with the consent of sellers under which prices for goods are reduced. Teodor Carnat believes that undervaluation of goods is a serious problem and for its settlement is necessary to involve the Customs Service and the State Enterprise "Cadastre".
What anticorruption experts say
Spinei Ioannina, expert at Transparency International-Moldova, argues that magistrates and other civil servants take advantage of a gap in the legislation. "The law provides that the declarations of assets are to indicate prices of contracts for sale. Intentionally lower prices are indicated, so assubsequently to pay lower taxes and goods are justifiable as purchased within legal income. It is clear that the legislation must be changed. But there is also a law of common sense, which many fail to comply with "the expert said.
Cristi Danilet, member of the Superior Council of Magistrates of Romania shares a similar view:
"Magistrates can have legal incomeonly. All income and assets must be declared. If someone purchases a property, its real value must be declared. Otherwise the act is an offence of forgery. I cannot understand why a magistrate who has nothing to hide, who is fair, would pass other amounts in acts of purchase of an asset, real estate or car. Integrity implies maximum fairness. Unfortunately, some still do not understand this concept. It requires transparency and positive pressure to change the current situation."
Olga Batca, President of the Anti-Corruption Alliance, explains the phenomenon by the fact that legal provisions have not been tailored so as to prevent corruption. "There are articles in the Criminal Code that need to demonstrate the intent to commit false statements. Because intent cannot be proven, General Prosecutor dismisses the case. All efforts of the investigative media, NGOs in the field and NIC are reduced to zero, while people with doubtful integrity hold on to their posts, "said the expert.
According to Olga Batca, currently, a draft law is being developed on reforming the NIC. "It is the third package of draft laws with the purpose of unlocking the NIC activity and focusing on the corruption prevention aspect. The draft was blocked by formerGaburici Government. Do you expect a person that decreases ten times the value of the car or fails to mention it at all in the income and assets statement,to work exclusively for the public interest? "commented Mrs. Batca.
The investigation is carried out under the "Shining a Light on Corruption in Moldova" project conducted by the Center for Investigative Journalism and Freedom House, with the support of the Foreign Ministry of Norway.
Investigations in the same category:
"Poor" prosecutors with apartments, houses and tens of thousands of euros donated by parents and relatives
Every fourth prosecutor in the Republic of Moldova reported in the statement on property for 2020 donations from parents, in-laws, brothers, sisters or other close relatives. Reporters of the Anticoruptie.md portal screened the statements on property of all prosecutors in Moldova and found that about 170 state prosecutors out of the nearly 700 active prosecutors in the Prosecutor's Office structures indicated in the documents on property submitted to the National Integrity Authority that they received generous gifts last year - houses, apartments, land or tens of thousands of euros. Prosecutor with luxury real estate "inherited from parents" The prosecutor for special
Wealthy donors of magistrates
Houses, apartments and tens of thousands of euros received as gifts Every year, dozens of judges in the Republic of Moldova report that they have accepted gifts. The year 2020 is no exception. Every fifth judge in the Republic of Moldova reported in his statement on property for last year donations from parents, in-laws, brothers, sisters or other close relatives. No less than 84 magistrates out of over 400 who work today in the courts of Moldova indicated in the documents presented to the National Integrity Authority that they received gifts last year, either money, cars or real estate. She lives
THE ESCAPE OF THE OLIGARCH
An exclusive document obtained by the Center for Investigative Journalism in Moldova (CIJM) reveals that the former leader of the Democratic Party of Moldova (PDM) readied his early leave from Moldova and the exit with his family to the West. Plahotniuc and his family are declared undesirable persons in the US. The former leader of the Democratic Party of Moldova is in the list of ineligible persons for receiving visas published by the US State Department because of “significant corruption actions” in Moldova. Also, pleading the same cause, the US authorities declared the entire Plahotniuc family "ineligible" for visas to
INSPECTORS FROM THE ANTICORRUPTION PROSECUTION
Most of the 21 state inspectors appointed by the general prosecutor Alexandr Stoianoglo to verify the activity of the Anticorruption Prosecutor's Office for the past 4 years have integrity problems themselves. Some of the inspectors even have connections or interests with pending cases at the institution subjected to control. How the control was arranged Morari and Compan prosecutors, seen on the morning of December 9 at entry into PG The general prosecutor Alexandr Stoianoglo signed the order to carry out the controls at the Anti-corruption Prosecution and the Prosecutor's Office for Combating Organized Crime and Special Cases (PCCOCS) on Monday morning, December 9,
VIDEO // Story of a bribe for prosecutors
A "remuneration" of 235 thousand euros would have determined the Anticorruption prosecutors to stop the criminal prosecution and to release a businessman suspected of money laundering in particularly large proportions. The intermediary who filmed with the hidden camera the moment when the money was transmitted to a prosecutor, reported the case to the Anti-corruption Prosecutor's Office. The case was covered up and the complaint was removed from the record. From trafficker to creative man and patron Gheorghe Vîrtosu. Photo: virtosuart.com The businessman who was investigated by the CNA (National Anticorruption Center) for money laundering is Gheorghe Vîrtosu and lives in the
Property and interests of candidates for the seat of general prosecutor
20 candidates applied for the seat of Prosecutor General, initiated by the Ministry of Justice in late September. Among those who compete for the seat of general prosecutor are lawyers, jurists, prosecutors. Anticoruptie.md portal reveals the profile of candidates and their property. UPDATE: 4 of the 20 candidates competing for the seat of general prosecutor were not admitted to the contest. The Ministry of Justice announced that, following the evaluation of the files submitted, the Commission for the pre-selection of candidates to the office of general prosecutor admitted 16 candidates. Thus, the lawyer Ilie Rotaru, former prosecutor Ion Vicol, prosecutor of
Main state institutions, guarded by security companies with criminal past close to Vlad Plahotniuc and of “the thief in law” Makena
Two private enterprises of over 100 that ensure security and detective services gained advantageous tenders for the security of state institutions for many years. One of the companies belongs to an off-shore company, affiliated to the leader of PDM, Vladimir Plahotniuc, and the other is of a former policeman, who would be connected to the criminal authority Vladimir Moscalciuc, alias Makena. Though, these companies are targeted in dubious schemes, torture cases, use of force, illegal interceptions and other serious actions, they are free to guard public institutions, including those in justice field, despite the prohibitions of the law. The
INDICTMENT: April 7, 2009. How torturing policemen, judges and prosecutors were (NOT) held accountable
On April 7-8, 2009, when thousands of young people went out to protest against the April 5 parliamentary election fraud, and police forces were mobilized to repress the peaceful protest, hundreds of young people were detained forcefully, and taken to police commissariats, where they were humiliated and tortured. Dozens of prosecutors and judges went to police commissariats and judged the young people maltreated for mass disorder or hooliganism without taking any attitude to police atrocities. Ten years after the events of April 2009, we find that several files were closed or suspended and the truth was not revealed. Not a
INDICTMENT: April 7, 2009. Ten years of injustice
Ten years after the violent actions of April 7, 2009, following a peaceful protest triggered by the authorities, where hundreds of young people have been maltreated and tried in the police commissariats, no prosecutor, judge or policeman has ever been punished for abuses committed. Prosecutors filed 71 criminal cases, but only some of those who participated in the devastation of Parliament and Presidency buildings were punished. Just one policeman, who fled the country and wanted by Interpol, was sentenced to jail. All officials who somehow managed the actions of the police forces or were indifferent during the events of
Greek magistrates did what justice in Moldova didn’t: former international expert sentenced to 2 years in prison for pedophilia
Eight years after the publication of an investigation of the Center of Investigative Journalism about a network of pedophiles in Moldova and Ukraine, Greek justice ruled: Nick Georgiadis, one of the pedophiles abusing minors, was convicted. Tuesday, February 26, in Greece, two years in prison. In the Republic of Moldova, Georgiadis was "escaped" from criminal punishment. "The court in Athens, Greece did not acknowledge any mitigating circumstances and sentenced Georgiadis, aged 55, to a 28-month prison sentence and a fine of 20,000 euros. At the time of committing the crimes, he was advisor to the Minister of Economy within the
Judges with apartments for free
During the last five years (2012-2017), more than MDL 127 million were allocated from the Chisinau municipality budget to provide with apartments some persons who sued the City Hall asking for housing or for concluding reconciliation transactions with it. Among the beneficiaries of such apartments, but also of funds, there are also magistrates. Some of them, although they received apartments free of charge from the housing stock of Chisinau municipality, have enriched themselves in the meantime with other dwellings: some of these being purchased at preferential prices, others - bought at market price. There are also judges who have
Women victims of domestic violence, facing alone the aggressors and the justice system
Victims of domestic violence, mostly women, often depend on a justice system that does not protect them and does not show leniency when out of despair they try to defend themselves or counter-attack, say lawyers and human rights activists. Angela Gojan. Photo: CIJM Angela Gojan was just over 20 years old when her marriage became a nightmare for her. Finally, 10 years later, she decided to break the vicious circle. The woman says that she was cruelly beaten for trifles: someone looked at her, or she did not take care of the child or did not exactly meet her husband's requirements.
„50 shadows“ of the billion dollar theft cases
Every time when prosecutors are asked about the investigation of the billion dollar theft they invoke three criminal cases, and namely, "Shor case", "Filat case" and "Platon case” that have had different "fates" since the start of the prosecution. Several violations of the proceedings, excesses on the side of prosecutors and judges, ill-treatment, and human rights violations in custody and detention were reported in two of these cases. Reference to Shor, the first person concerned in a criminal case on the theft from Banca de Economii, Banca Sociala and Unibank, the case has "frozen" on the table of the
„Stemma” of justice (II)
They were colleagues at the Law faculty, and now they are acting as judges, being opponents from the post of judges, lawyers or prosecutors. Though they say that the relationships of colleagues from the period of study do not influence on their professional activity in any way, several concrete cases prove that some judges and prosecutors have been promoted just in the period when their faculty colleagues served important posts in the justice system. You can see below the university colleagues of the chairman of the Supreme Court of Justice Mihai Poalelungi, of the General Prosecutor Eduard Harunjen and of
„Stemma” of justice
They have been colleagues at the Faculty of Law and now they are acting as judges, lawyers or prosecutors. Some of these are god-parents, god-sons while others - spouses, sons, daughters, brothers or sisters. All of them claim that personal relationships do not prevent them from being objective, in a country where most citizens perceive justice as the most corrupt field. In 2013, Ziarul de Garda (Zdg) revealed how the lawyer Iurie Guriev, god father of judge Oxana Banari (Mironov) who was serving at that time at the Donduseni District Court, did not request the magistrate's appeal in a case
AUDIO, DOC // “Ghost” banker in Vlad Filat’s case
A well-known Russian banker was attracted unknowingly in the controversial case of former PM Vlad Filat. Former executive chairman of the Russian Petrocomerţ bank is accused of having met in February 2013, former general secretary of the Government Victor Bodiu and they planned to take over a part of bad assets from Banca de Economii (BEM). According to the report Kroll, taking bad loans worth about one billion lei by Roseau Alliance LLP was the first step in taking over the BEM scheme. Reporters of the Center for Investigative Journalism found the banker but he does not know anything
Apartments at low price for magistrate Oleg Melniciuc’s mother and relatives in the residential block for judges
The head of the court Oleg Melniciuc, his mother and some of his relatives will get apartments and commercial property in the residential block on the street Hristo Botev 6 in Chisinau, which is currently being built for the magistrates of Rascani District Court in the capital and for their children. The magistrate himself who initially said that, though he owned some dwellings and he would like some flats for his children, he did not buy any flat in this block, but a commercial space. The president of the Superior Council of Magistracy Victor Micu received a flat in the
False witnesses in Vlad Filat’s case
Three women from the Russian Federation, who seem not to know about the situation in Moldova, appear as key-witnesses in the resounding corruption case involving Vlad Filat. According to statements made by Ilan Sor in court, they would have brokered alleged bribery worth 320 million lei to former Prime Minister. These statements were accepted by the court and included in the sentence without inviting the youths for evidence. Center for Investigative Journalism found the names of these girls and contacted two of them. The girls claim that they have never beento Moldova and do not know Ilan Sor and
18 bln USD laundered through the judiciary in Moldova since 2010 (II)
About 18 billion dollars, 17 judges, three "ghost" cases whose signatories are missing, a case destroyed and a judge unwillingly involved in the scheme of legalizing "black" money in the Russian Federation. Continuation from November 20 In the period 2010-2014, the Republic of Moldova has turned into a real "laundering" of large amounts of money from Russian Federation. The scheme included at least 17 Moldovan prosecutors who have legalized profits that would have been obtained illegally, wrote the Russian media. On the other hand, officials of the National Anti-Corruption Center say they cannot speak about “money laundering" in this case, because
18 bln USD laundered through the judiciary in Moldova since 2010 (I)
Since 2010, the Republic of Moldova became a real system of money laundering in the region through the courts. This "fame" went around the world and half of the 20 judges who dictated shameful verdicts continue to judge and "do justice" to this day. Many judges who have "legalized" black money from Russia were later on involved in scandals. However, the system does not want to "cleanse" itself and some of the judges who participated in money laundering scheme were even appointed court presidents. Copycat ordinances Schemes used by criminals for money laundering were always the same - some offshore companies in
The judges “with nine lives”
In the documents remitted to the SCM, Vladimir Voronin, Marian Lupu, Mihai Ghimpu and Nicolae Timofti have cautioned that those rejected do not have a place in the judiciary because they discredit Justice, are not objective, have unjustified wealth, have integrity issues, relations with businessmen conducting shady businesses. Most often, the findings were based on the reports from the Information and Security Service (ISS). Despite the arguments brought by the rulers of the country, SCM kept on position or even promoted around 55 judges. In the meantime, some of them left the system honorably taking their sins with them,
The stories from www.anticoruptie.md may be used in the limit of up to 1,000 characters. Web pages must indicate the source and link directly to the article. Print media, Radio and TV stations must indicate the source. Publishing full version of stories is allowed based on a prior agreement with the Center for Investigative Journalism. Articles published on www.anticoruptie.md are protected by the Law on copyright and related rights of Republic of Moldova.